Prologue
It has been stated, by women's groups, by media pundits etc, and many times, that :
women are oppressed by marriage (a feminist ideology)
women and children end in poverty after divorce (repeated in the media)
the children's interests are the paramount concern (as in the written law, by the government and the judiciary).
As an example of mis-information, Sue Slipman, then Chair of the National Association for One-Parent Families, was heard to say on radio "there should be a redistribution of money within the family". Implying that women should somehow have more of it.
All of this is part of the Big Lie in matrimonial & family law. It provides persecution of honest & decent men, and massive privileges for women.
To accommodate this Big Lie, the authorities have developed comprehensive corruption, degeneracy and lack of control in matrimonial & family law.
Corruption
Matrimonial & family law is corrupt :
the judges are not following the written law, and are following principles which most people do not agree with
lawyers are complying with the charade as they make a good living from this at the expense of decent men
one important component, Court Welfare Officers have a written policy to support women's rights and ignore men's and children's rights.
Degeneracy
women are being rewarded for villainous behaviour
women profit from marriage at the cost of damage to innocent men's lives
the children's objectively defined interests are being ignored
lawyers are stripping family assets, which should be preserved for the benefit of the family.
Lack of control
no authorities will respond to this situation
all attempts to alert them have resulted in obfuscation, smoke screens of mis-information, etc.
appeals to Bishops, MPs, MEPs, etc have had no results, as they are all concerned for their own jobs, positions, women's votes, etc.
A staggering achievement
Matrimonial & family law is the most serious issue for men, as feminists have almost entirely succeeded in destroying men's rights in marriage and the family, as we describe under Marriage for Men. This is a staggering achievement. To give some appreciation of just how staggering, consider the following analogy :
The mortgage system
We have in the UK the provision of mortgages for people to buy homes, and laws to regulate this. Let's call this the 'mortgage system'. Mortgages are contracts between a bank or building society, and individuals or couples, and are regulated by law. There are responsibilities and rights on both sides of the mortgage contract. As we don't know of any organised opposition to the mortgage system, let's assume that most people consider that the system and contracts are fair.
Corrupting the mortgage system
Suppose that a group of people thought that mortgages were 'oppressive' or damaging to others, and so did not agree with the principle that individuals should be able to borrow money to buy a home and, for their own greedy and selfish objectives, wished to destroy the mortgage system. How could they destroy the mortgage system ? Well, they could do this by undermining the individual's rights in the mortgage, e.g. to the point that a bank could completely determine the terms of the contract and change them at will, and the individuals would be helpless to prevent this. To accomplish this, it would be necessary to ensure that the law could provide no protection to the individual, so some corruption to fair law would be needed. The practical effects for the individual would be, for example, that the bank could double the interest rate at a moments notice, require repayment of double the capital, or evict borrowers from their homes without reason, while the innocent individual finds that they could obtain no protection in law.
This would result in individuals losing control of their rights over each and all of these :
- home
- life savings
- and future income and expenditure
by actions of the bank or building society, for which the individual had no defence in law. This would obviously be to say the least, grossly unfair to the individual and unacceptable to the public. For innocent persons to be treated in this way is correctly described as uncivilised, for innocent people to be treated this way in large numbers each year as a holocaust against an entire section of the community i.e. those who borrow money for their homes. Such a course of events would obviously deter people from taking out mortgages and lead to the destruction of the mortgage system.
Consider how such a group of people could achieve such unjust and evil practices to become normal. It would be difficult to imagine the sequence of steps needed to achieve this. Also how the legal system could be sufficiently manipulated, corrupted and to become so degenerate, that such treatment of borrowers became normal practice. Also that there might not be any corrective mechanisms in place for a remedy.
To ensure that such a corrupt mortgage system were to continue, it would be necessary to ensure that :
- corruption and malpractices existed in the legal system involved in mortgages, both in the law making and law interpretation processes
- degenerate principles were to be tolerated by senior judges, and while individuals could write to their MPs making complaints and asking for remedy, that Parliament and Government would do nothing
- the normal correction mechanisms e.g. complaints procedures about those involved, the banks and building societies, and the lawyers and judges, would be ineffective.
A comparison with matrimonial and family law
The corruption in matrimonial and family law is significantly more serious than the corruption we conjecture above in the mortgage system. This is because a woman may discard a husband, without giving any reasons which will be examined by a court, and dispossess the man of not only his :
- home
- life savings
- and future income and expenditure
but also his
- children
- and pension rights.
And this is effected by ensuring that the legal system will give an innocent man no protection.
If we consider the corrupt mortgage system to be uncivilised, how then do we describe the current matrimonial system, which wrecks the lives of about 100,000 innocent men every year ?
What has happened in less than 50 years, has been such corruption to the matrimonial system - a far greater achievement than the conjectured corruption to the mortgage system described above. They have not only removed men's rights in marriage, a most fundamental unit in society, but ensured persecution of men by the law. Men's rights have been eradicated, not only over a man's home, life savings, and future income, these factors directly comparable to the mortgage system, but also over his children and pension rights.
This has been a staggering achievement for the feminists. Just as staggering has been the compliance of successive governments and the legal system with such evil.
And this has been achieved using part of The Big Lie, that women are oppressed by marriage.
Comment : When will the facts come out ?